Salvatore Sciascia

Purpose: When adversity hits, CEO's leadership is determinant in interpreting, responding to and recovering from shocks. Yet, despite extensive research on corporate resilience across macro-, meso- and micro-levels, little is known about the individual-level drivers through which CEOs shape the firm's ability to recover quickly. Building on upper echelons theory, we examine how CEO tenure functions as a double-edged sword, balancing accumulated experience against risks of rigidity, and whether CEOs' risk-taking moderates this relationship. Design/methodology/approach: We draw on a panel of non-financial firms listed on Euronext Milan from 2013 to 2023. Corporate resilience is operationalized as the time needed to recover from episodes of financial distress, estimated through a Cox Proportional Hazards model. Findings: Our results reveal a U-shaped relationship between CEO tenure and corporate resilience in terms of time to recovery. Recovery time decreases, thus increasing corporate resilience, during the mid-phase of a CEO's tenure when experiential learning and organizational knowledge are at their peak, thereby enhancing resilience. Additionally, CEO risk-taking negatively moderates this relationship: a higher risk propensity increases the likelihood that CEOs pursue rapid actions to overcome distress, further boosting resilience. Originality/value: By framing resilience as time to recovery, our study shows that CEO tenure and risk-taking orientation are key factors in corporate resilience, bridging two largely separate research domains: leadership studies and resilience research.

ESG practices offer various benefits for family firms; however, there has been limited focus on how these practices can specifically advantage the owning family. To address this gap, we conduct a multiple-case study of six Italian family firms. Responding to recent calls for research (Stock et al., 2024) and building on the growing literature on ESG in family business, we adopt the family as the primary unit of analysis and investigate the outcomes that the owning family derives from the firm's ESG practices. Our findings reveal that engagement in ESG fosters a set of interrelated, family-level outcomes. We conceptualize these outcomes as Continuity, Alignment, Relationships, and Ethics (summarized as C.A.R.E.), four concepts that are reinforced, nurtured, and developed through sustained ESG engagement. These concepts together function as key intangible resources that contribute to the long-term success of family businesses.

This study investigates how successors, by acting entrepreneurially, contribute to family firm transgenerational value creation. By focusing on the transgenerational value creation process, we investigate transgenerational entrepreneurship in family businesses under successor leadership. Employing a multiple case study approach, we analyse 15 Italian family firms, based on direct interviews, follow-ups, field observations, and approximately 300 historical documents spanning the period 1894 to 2023. Our findings reveal how individual, contextual, business, and familial drivers, alone or in combination, point to various pathways influencing entrepreneurial outcomes, thereby reflecting the diverse forms of successor entrepreneurship. Specifically, we develop a taxonomy comprising five entrepreneurial profiles: revolutioner, orchestrator, venturer, renewer, and improver. Our findings offer novel insights into the family business and entrepreneurship literature, along with practical implications and potential contributions to regional development.

Since its inception, research on Integrated Reporting (IR) has progressed along multiple paths. Yet two critical questions remain underexplored: (1) whether the quality—rather than mere adoption—of IR is value relevant, and (2) how the legal environment might moderate this relationship. This study addresses these gaps using a panel dataset of 78 IR adopters, identified as leading practices by the International Integrated Reporting Council, over the 2017–2020 period. The findings contribute to the IR literature in two ways. First, building on the relatively underexplored theoretical perspective of proprietary cost theory, this study integrates it with agency theory to analyze the impact of IR disclosure quality. The study shows that IR quality has a positive association with firm value, illustrating that quality matters above and beyond adoption alone. Second, the study complements agency theory with neo-institutional theory to further investigate the relationship between IR disclosure quality and capital market outcomes. Results demonstrate that this relationship is moderated by the legal context: it is stronger in countries (a) where IR is voluntary and (b) with civil law legal systems. These insights suggest that regulators should not only encourage IR adoption but also nudge higher-quality disclosures. Aware of these benefits, managers may further fine-tune IR quality to maximize its impact on the firm’s market value.

Despite significant growth in strategic management literature, research on firm-level capabilities in family business remains fragmented. This paper aims to consolidate this field by comprehensively examining ordinary and dynamic capabilities in family firms. Drawing on the theoretical foundations of the resource-based view and dynamic capability theories, we conducted a systematic literature review of relevant theoretical and empirical studies, including 76 journal ar ticles, spanning a period of more than 20 years. The study proposes a framework that systematizes the literature, outlining main drivers (e.g., family influence and other factors), types of capabilities (ordinary and dynamic), and related outcomes (competitive, financial, and non-financial). The review emphasizes the critical role of family influence—in terms of family business status and family involvement—in shaping capability development and highlights the importance of family behavioral dynamics, including familiness and socioemotional wealth. Finally, the study identifies gaps in existing literature and proposes research questions to guide future research.

Exploring the intricacies of heterogeneity in tax avoidance practices within family firms, a growing trend acknowledges the significant role of chief executive officers (CEOs) in setting the ethical tone and shaping corporate tax strategies. However, these studies often overlook the influence of the CEO’s transgenerational orientation, which becomes crucial when assessing ethics in family businesses. Therefore, the paper aims to analyse to what extent the CEO’s transgenerational responsibility (the moral obligation that incumbent leaders have vis-à-vis next generation family members) affects tax avoidance with a utilitarianism lens. Relying on a sample of 272 firm-year observations of Italian listed family companies along the period 2014–2018, the panel regression model finds a positive relationship. Moreover, the involvement in the business of the next generation of family members strengthens this relationship, suggesting that the immediate proximity with other relatives fosters the conversion of the CEO’s transgenerational responsibility into tax avoidance practices. Finally, when the family firm is in financial distress, CEOs with greater transgenerational responsibility tend to avoid more taxes.

While tax avoidance has attracted scholarly and policy interest over the years, its peculiarities in family business are far from being completely understood. Motivated by the growing attention to family firms' tax-saving strategies, this paper aims to critically and systematically review the 42 articles on tax avoidance in family businesses published up to June 2024. The study organises the literature upon four levels of analysis and offers future research avenues to move our knowledge on the topic forward.

This paper examines the impact of national culture on sustainability performance in B Corps questioning if companies' size matters. In times when sustainability is increasingly integral to business practices, B Corps serve as exemplary models by prioritising social and environmental performance alongside profit. Measuring sustainability performance through the B Impact Score, complemented by financial data, a sample of 219 companies was analysed. Following the European Union's corporate size classification, the sample was divided into 104 smaller companies (micro and small firms) and 115 larger companies (medium and large). Regression analysis reveals that culture does not influence sustainability performance in larger B Corps. However, for smaller B Corps, individualism and uncertainty avoidance negatively affect sustainability, while long-term orientation, power distance, and achievement motivation have a positive impact. The results highlight the importance of cultural considerations in enhancing sustainability performance and call for further exploration of cultural dimensions in smaller firms.

This paper explores the drivers and inhibitors of the transition of entrepreneurial family firms from small to large firms. We adopt two contrasting theoretical perspectives, i.e. agency and stewardship, to explore the effects of family power on size transition. Design/methodology/approach – We adopted an original research design that leverages a unique longitudinal database built starting from the list of the 500 best Italian manufacturing family firms published by the AUB Monitor in 2018. Specifically, we tested our hypotheses using a comprehensive set of financial and governance data from 89 Italian manufacturing family firms covering a 10-year period. To test our hypotheses, we conducted a survival analysis using a Cox regression. Findings – We find an inverted U-shaped relationship between family involvement in ownership and size transition: size transition is more likely to happen at intermediate levels of family involvement in ownership. Additionally, our analysis shows that family involvement in the board of directors negatively impacts size transition, while the presence of a family CEO has a positive influence. Originality/value – To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first exploration of the phenomenon of size transition within entrepreneurial family firms. We believe it was worthwhile for two reasons. First, small size is frequently regarded as a weakness when competing in international markets, investing in R&D, or rewarding shareholders. Second, since small family firms are the major contributors to the world economy, understanding the factors that facilitate their transition to large firms can have a significant impact on overall economic development and prosperity.