This paper summarizes an analysis of the Joint Clinical Assessment (JCA) subgroup’s recommendations for systematic literature reviews (SLRs). While the JCA offers clear guidance on study classification, exclusion criteria reporting, and PRISMA diagram use, several of its recommendations diverge from established best practices in evidence-based medicine (EBM). A comparison with recognized guidelines, such as those from Cochrane and EUnetHTA, reveals that the JCA guidance may lack reliability, comprehensiveness, and reproducibility. Aligning JCA recommendations with gold standards in SLR methodology would address these shortcomings and enhance methodological rigor.
- The EU-joint clinical assessment guidance documents fail to address the significance of systematic literature reviews and deviate from the state of the art
- Beata Smela (Corresponding Author)Mondher Toumi (Author)Samuel Aballéa (Author)Steven Simoens (Author)Laurent Boyer (Author)Bruno Falissard (Author)Renato Bernardini (Author)Stefano Capri (Author) - Università Carlo Cattaneo - LIUCPascal Auquier (Author)
- Journal of market access & health policy, Vol.14(3), pp.1-11
- 2026
- MDPI; Basel
- 2001-6689
- Online
- 11
- English
- Tutti i diritti sono riservati ai legittimi detentori del copyright. L'Università Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC pubblica i dati relativi alle pubblicazioni di ricerca realizzate dai propri affiliati. La presenza nell'archivio ARL di testi completi non determina in alcun modo la libera riproduzione degli stessi, ma esclusivamente la possibilità della loro consultazione sul sito di ARL.
- Università Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC
- Journal article
- 991001147423805126