Logo image
The EU-joint clinical assessment guidance documents fail to address the significance of systematic literature reviews and deviate from the state of the art
 

The EU-joint clinical assessment guidance documents fail to address the significance of systematic literature reviews and deviate from the state of the art

Beata Smela, Mondher Toumi, Samuel Aballéa, Steven Simoens, Laurent Boyer, Bruno Falissard, Renato Bernardini, Stefano Capri Pascal Auquier
Journal of market access & health policy, Vol.14(3), pp.1-11
2026
: 2-s2.0-105051599921
: PMC13397900
: 42496359
EU-HTA Health Joint clinical assessment Methodology PICO Systematic literature review Technology Assessment
This paper summarizes an analysis of the Joint Clinical Assessment (JCA) subgroup’s recommendations for systematic literature reviews (SLRs). While the JCA offers clear guidance on study classification, exclusion criteria reporting, and PRISMA diagram use, several of its recommendations diverge from established best practices in evidence-based medicine (EBM). A comparison with recognized guidelines, such as those from Cochrane and EUnetHTA, reveals that the JCA guidance may lack reliability, comprehensiveness, and reproducibility. Aligning JCA recommendations with gold standards in SLR methodology would address these shortcomings and enhance methodological rigor.

(2)

pdf
991001147423805126223.49 kB
Published (Version of record) Ask the Library / Chiedi alla Biblioteca Restricted Access
url
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmahp14030037
Published (Version of record)
1
Logo image