Abstract
This study analyzes the performance and sectoral allocation of “sustainable” versus “traditional” funds. Using a unique panel dataset of 9620 mutual funds distributed in Europe between October 2018 and January 2025, we examine the three types of ESG funds identified by the EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation), namely, Art. 6 (“traditional”) and Art. 8 and 9 (“sustainable”). Our findings show that Art. 9 funds significantly underperformed Art. 6 and Art. 8 funds; Art. 8 portfolios overperformed Art. 6 funds, but the difference becomes insignificant when controlling for size and liquidity. Analysis of a subsample reveals no sectoral allocation differences between Art. 6 and Art. 8 funds, while Art. 9 funds display greater sectoral concentration. This article contributes to the literature on ESG investing with a detailed analysis of the correlation between the SFDR classification, the mutual funds’ performance and the sectoral investment distribution.