Logo image
Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment

Giovanni Mauri, Emanuele Porazzi, Luca Cova, Umberto Restelli, Tania Tondolo, Marzia Bonfanti, Anna Cerri, Tiziana Ierace, Davide Croce and Luigi Solbiati
Insights into imaging, Vol.5(2), pp.209-216
2014
Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84899660299
Web of Science ID: WOS:000215415100004
PMID: 24563244

Abstract

Radiofrequency ablation Hepatocellular carcinoma Cost-effectiveness Clinical impact Budget impact Health technology assessment Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced Ultrasound
Objectives: To assess the clinical and the economic impacts of intraprocedural use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients undergoing percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for small (<2.5 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas. Methods: One hundred and forty-eight hepatocellular carcinomas in 93 patients were treated by percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and immediate assessment by intraprocedural CEUS. Clinical impact, cost effectiveness, and budget, organisational and equity impacts were evaluated and compared with standard treatment without intraprocedural CEUS using the health technology assessment approach. Results: Intraprocedural CEUS detected incomplete ablation in 34/93 (36.5 %) patients, who underwent additional treatment during the same session. At 24-h, complete ablation was found in 88/93 (94.6 %) patients. Thus, a second session of treatment was spared in 29/93 (31.1 %) patients. Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed an advantage for the use of intraprocedural CEUS in comparison with standard treatment (4,639 vs 6,592) with a 21.9 % reduction of the costs to treat the whole sample. Cost per patient for complete treatment was € 4,609 versus € 5,872 respectively. The introduction of intraprocedural CEUS resulted in a low organisational impact, and in a positive impact on equity Conclusions: Intraprocedural use of CEUS has a relevant clinical impact, reducing the number of re-treatments and the related costs per patient.
pdf
bitstream_e2df0cf1-5c0e-4fae-9528-251efab8f569422.48 kB
Ask the Library / Chiedi alla Biblioteca Restricted Access
url
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13244-014-0315-7View
Published (Version of record) Open

Metrics

58 Record Views

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
Logo image