Abstract
A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to evaluate the impact on hospital costs of two alternative regimens, idarubicin + cytarabine and daunorubicin + cytarabine, in the induction treatment of newly-diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In evaluating the economic effects the perspectives of both hospital doctors and administrators were taken into account in order to achieve better value for money spent. For this study, the comparative results from four recently published randomized clinical studies were used as the source of clinical data. Data on the duration of hospitalization, hospital procedures and AML treatment costs were obtained from the patient records of two haematological centers. The idarubicin induction regimen appeared to be more cost-effective than that of daunorubicin in achieving complete remission, especially when costs are linked to response rate. Although several methodological issues in terms of economic evaluation still need to be solved, this type of study might offer a social contribution to the problem of the efficient allocation of resources in the health care sector.