Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arl.liuc.it/dspace/handle/2468/5682
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorHeshmati, Almas-
dc.creatorOh, JongEun-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-16T07:30:38Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-16T07:30:38Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arl.liuc.it/dspace/handle/2468/5682-
dc.description.abstractThis study addresses the measurement of two composite Lisbon strategy indices that quantifies the level and patterns of development for ranking countries. The first index is nonparametric labelled as Lisbon strategy index (LSI). It is composed of six components: general economics, employment, innovation research, economic reform, social cohesion and environment, each generated from a number of Lisbon indicators. LSI by reducing the complexity of the set of indicators, it makes the ranking procedures quite simple. The second and parametric index is based on principal component analysis. Despite the difference in the ranking by the two indices, it is shown that the United States outperformed most EU-member states. Our investigations also show evidence of significant dynamic changes taking place, as the countries of the Union struggle to achieve the Lisbon goals. The necessity of a real reform agenda in several old and new members and candidate countries emerges from our analysis. We briefly refer to two important European phenomena emerging from our data analysis and discuss the possible lessons learned from the Korean development strategy.en
dc.formatOnlineen
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherEuropean Association for Comparative Economic Studies (EACES)en
dc.publisherUniversità Carlo Cattaneo - LIUCit
dc.relation.ispartofThe European journal of comparative economicsen
dc.rightshttp://www.biblio.liuc.it/pagineita.asp?codice=247-
dc.titleAlternative composite Lisbon development strategy indices: a comparison of EU, USA, Japan and Koreaen
dc.typeArticolo in rivista internazionale referenziatait
dc.subject.keywordsEconomic developmenten
dc.subject.keywordsComposite indexen
dc.subject.keywordsLisbon agendaen
prism.urlhttp://eaces.liuc.it/18242979200602/182429792006030201.pdf-
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationHeshmati Almas, Oh JongEun (2006), Alternative composite Lisbon development strategy indices: a comparison of EU, USA, Japan and Korea. In: The European Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 3, n. 2, 2006, p. 131-170. E-ISSN 1824-2979.-
dc.type.refereedanonymousen
dc.identifier.eissn1824-2979-
dc.relation.firstpage131-
dc.relation.lastpage170-
dc.relation.issue2, 2006-
dc.relation.volume3-
dc.type.publicationstatuspubblicatoit
dc.accessrightsopenAccessen
dc.publisher.countryITA-
dc.publisher.placeCastellanzait
dc.subject.jelCodeC43-
dc.subject.jelCodeF15-
dc.subject.jelCodeO10-
dc.subject.jelCodeO57-
dc.audienceAccademicoit
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-ND 4.0-
Appears in Collections:EJCE

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
EJCE_2006-03-02_133.pdf
  Restricted Access
395,97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.